THE BELOVED SEEMS TO BE GOD: This verse is, in one respect, a mirror image of 20,3 and the other verses discussed there. While those verses cannot appropriately be addressed to God, this one cannot appropriately be addressed to any human beloved, but can only make sense if it's addressed to God. Some other examples of such verses: 98,2 ; 100,3 ; 102,2 ; 110, 3-7 (some verses of which have also been said to be addressed to the Prophet); 143,4 ; 162,4 ; 163,5 ; 163,6 ; 196,3 // 349x,8 ; 424x , . For verses in which the beloved seems explicitly not to be God, see 20,3 . This is one verse in which I find the commentators truly irritating. Not one of them even mentions the chief piquancy of the verse: its wonderful number-play. and both have the root of in its variant form ; just as 'oneness' and 'unique' in English have the same Latin root and related meanings. Similarly, in the second line as 'twoness' actually shares the root of our 'duality'. Then the crowning touch is of course the idiom , literally 'to be two-four', but colloquially, 'to meet, to come face to face with' (see the definition above). As is his wont, Ghalib has used the expression in both its idiomatic sense and its dictionary sense. (For another example of enjoyable number-play, see 132,6 .) It's also a great 'mushairah verse'. From the first line we listeners can't at all tell where the verse is going; under mushairah performance conditions we are made to wait, in speculation and anticipation, to hear the second line. Then when we do hear it, we still can't interpret it (except for quickly noting the numbers wordplay) until suddenly, at the last possible moment, completes the sound and wordplay and sense in a single delightful rush. There are so many untranslatable verses in Ghalib, but this is one of the toughest cases, because there are such numerous (so to speak) puns, and they are simply not capturable, since they require the unifying punch of to become fully operative. Other conspicuous untranslatables, among many: 15,10 ; 21,1 . And just consider the great sound effects! The internal rhyme in the first line between and , right at the (quasi-)caesura break; with and in the same positions in the second line. The verse's effect of simplicity and colloquialness is enhanced by its swingy structuring of the four half-lines as semantic units that correspond perfectly to the metrical units. All the words are so simple, too, so Indic (almost all, anyway), and so conversational. Yet the theology is impeccable, and also witty. What more could anyone ask? Note for meter fans: is here scanned as - = ; but not, as we might guess, because the abstract-noun suffix is treated as separate from the root word itself. Rather, it's because is like the much more common : both very helpfully (to the poet, at least) have a scansion of 'x x' (two flexible syllables). For another verse with wordplay involving , see 102,2 . And here's Mir 's clever use of number imagery, in M 825,7 : [the six directions are now narrow upon us oh if only we hadn't met/'two-four'ed her!] graphics/onemany.jpg