Verse 61816anme;N


G2

1
before that sun-faced one's glory/appearance of resemblance
2
the polish-lines in the mirror became wing-fluttering, like/resembling dust-motes in crevice-work

'Resemblance, likeness, picture, portrait, image, effigy'.
'Essence, matter, substance, constituent, material part (opp. to accident), absolute or essential property; skill, knowledge, accomplishment, art; excellence, worth, merit, virtue; secret nature; defects, vices; — the diversified wavy marks, streaks, or grain of a well-tempered sword'.

References
Arshi, Imtiyaz Ali Ghazal# 91
Raza, Kalidas Gupta 209-210
Nuskhah-e-Hamidiyah 158-159
Asi, Abdul Bari 166
Gyan Chand 268-269
Hamid Ali Khan Open Image

Faruqi suggests comparison to 87,3 . I would add 17,4 , in which the polish-marks want to become eyelashes, which also flutter like wings. Dust-motes in shafts of bright sunlight appear to dance; this would be especially the case in the openings in the crevice-work [], which would put the dust-motes in a series of small 'spotlights' surrounded by the darker inner wall of the room. Dust-motes are lively, insubstantial, casual, quivering, hovering, darting here and there with every tiny breath of air. They are the very essence of unattached, delicate, floating responsiveness. On the nuances of , 'crevice-work', see 64,4 , and the earlier references in this ghazal. Polish-marks [] on a metal mirror are the complete opposite of dust-motes in crevice-work: they are static, metallic, incised, confined, linear, immutable, produced deliberately by hard scrubbing. They are the very essence of durability, stolidness, rigidity, one-dimensionality. Crevice-work in a wall is open, transparent, and in no danger of degradation in quality; a metal mirror is closed, opaque, and subject to verdigris that requires constant scrubbing to keep it at bay. Yet Ghalib has shown us affinities between dust-motes and polish-marks, crevice-work and mirrors-- because of further, more fundamental affinities between the beloved and the sun. The commentators have explained these, and it's clear how it all fits together: in their mutual relationships the beloved's likeness to the sun endows the polish-marks on the mirror with a likeness to the dust-motes in the crevice-work. In the first line, we have as a quality of the beloved's; in the second line, from the same root we have . To say that something is something else is so common an expression for 'like' or 'resembling' that it's normally almost invisible. But here, it is foregrounded by the prominence of its cousin in the first line. The beloved's glory/appearance of, or for, 'likeness' or 'resemblance' is what sets all lesser likenesses or resemblances going. Thanks to the multivalence of the , she has a glory/appearance 'of' resemblance (to the brilliance of the sun); or even possibly a glory/appearance 'for' resemblance, a power to generate or invite or compel in the polish-marks a resemblance to dancing dust-motes-- that is, to some of the least plausible simile-material that could possibly be adduced for them. Or, even more radically, the beloved might be 'sun-faced' [] not as a resemblance at all, but in the most literal sense: her face might act as the sun, or even be the sun; perhaps there is no other sun than her face. So her glorious power of inducing resemblance might be the only life-force in the universe, as her beauty transmits life and elicits life-like behavior from everything within its range. graphics/dustmotes.jpg graphics/palebluedot.jpg