Verse 4x1821ammeraa


G2

1
I am a wandering trace/sign of the manifestation of the 'two-worlds' turmoil of Doomsday
2
my dust is wing-fluttering that way, toward the desert of Nonexistence

'Sign, mark, footstep, trace, track, clue; search, inquiry; spying'.
'Without house and home; wandering, roving; astray; abandoned, lost; dissolute;—s.m. Wanderer; vagabond; profligate'.
'Presenting or representing; representation, petition, request, address; —(v.n. fr. , 'to be broad'), s.m. Breadth, width'.
'Cry, noise, outcry, exclamation, din, clamour, uproar, tumult, disturbance... ; --salt, brackish... ; very bitter; --unlucky'.
'A place of assembly or congregation ;--(for ), the day of the place of congregation, the day of judgment'.
'Dust; clouds of dust; a dust-storm; vapour, fog, mist, mistiness; impurity, foulness'.
'That side, thither, from the other side, through'. (Steingass p.111)

References
Arshi, Imtiyaz Ali Ghazal# 10
Raza, Kalidas Gupta 322-323
Nuskhah-e-Hamidiyah 27-28
Asi, Abdul Bari 60-61
Gyan Chand 84-87
Hamid Ali Khan Open Image

For background see S. R. Faruqi's choices . This verse is NOT one of his choices; I thought it was interesting and have added it myself. For more on Ghalib's unpublished verses, see the discussion in 4,8x . Asi and Gyan Chand seems to take to mean that the trace has been obscured or lost, so that the speaker doesn't know where he's going. Zamin takes it to mean that he is unfindable by the 'commotion of Doomsday'. Both these readings have problems. The level of abstraction is such that more readings can be invented almost at will. Really, though, how much mileage can we get out of this kind of reshuffling of unmoored abstractions? On as an 'inverted izafat' construction see 129,6x . On my reading, the whole verse describes the grandiose combination of liminality and inclusiveness claimed by the speaker. His passion and madness are so extravagant that he has attained the state of a wandering cloud of dust, a trace or sign of the dire 'two-worlds' turmoil of Doomsday. (For more on such 'two-worlds' constructions, see 18,2 .) Thus his state is paradoxical. Instead of behaving like ordinary dust or mist or other inanimate clouds of particles, the specks of the speaker's dust show his agitation by being 'wing-fluttering' like birds. (This isn't impossible: in 113,6 Ghalib makes the polish-lines on a metal mirror flutter their wings, and in 176,6 the wing-flutterer is a wave of blood.) So the speaker's dust-specks seem to be alive. But then, instead of behaving like an actual living creature, his dust-cloud is heading straight toward Nonbeing. In short, the speaker's nature has the impossibly amalgamated qualities appropriate to somebody who would call himself a sign of the 'two-worlds turmoil of Doomsday'. He claims everything; he's like a distant, crazed cousin of Walt Whitman. Such cosmic grandiosity is nothing so remarkable for him: just take a look at 62,8 . graphics/dust.jpg