Verse 31854aa))e;Nkyaa


G14

1
if there would be 'laag', then we would consider it affection
2 a
when there would be nothing at all, then-- as if we would be deceived!
2 b
when there would be nothing at all, then-- would we be deceived?

'Attachment, affection, love; —an application, or a direction (of the mind), aiming; aim; attention; exertion, endeavour, attempt; —touching, reaching, attaining (to), approach; cost, expenditure; —hitting, striking; fixing; —an attack of ill-fortune, a calamitous occurrence, a blow, stroke; enmity, animosity, hostility, rancour, spite, grudge; rivalry, competition; —narcotic quality (of a substance); —intrigue, plot; a secret; —trick, legerdemain, sleight of hand, jugglery; a charm, spell, fascination; —catch, hold, support, basis, ground; a prop'.
'Attachment, connexion; bond, link; ...inclination, propensity'.
'Deceit, deception, delusion; blunder, mistake; ... anything that may deceive or mislead'.

References
Arshi, Imtiyaz Ali Ghazal# 46
Raza, Kalidas Gupta 448-449
Hamid Ali Khan Open Image

The commentators stress the elegant wordplay, which is rendered even more spectacular by the fact that is so versatile. Most obviously, it can be either an antonym or a synonym for (though the synonymous usage is rarer). The lover isn't entirely sure he can tell the difference between and ; in fact, he'd be likely to (haplessly? deliberately?) identify the former as the latter. If he did so, he might be wrong-- or he might not. For not only do both nouns come from the same root, but has an extraordinary range of meanings that do indeed include both hatred and love. And so much more besides! For what the lover might consider to be affection might really be an 'aim, attempt', a 'reaching, attainment', a 'blow, stroke', a 'spite, grudge', a 'narcotic quality', an 'intrigue, plot', a 'secret', a 'trick', a 'charm, spell, fascination', and so on (see the definition above). Any of these possibilities could be mistaken for, or induce a false show of, affection. These complexities of hover as a kind of penumbra, adding to the effect of confusion in the mind of the perhaps deluded lover. So if the presence of one or another kind of strong emotion can confuse the lover, then might its absence not also prove bewildering, as in (2b)? Or would the lover go on loudly whistling in the dark, as in (2a)? The desperate lover has thus sought to turn every possible attitude of the beloved's to good account. If she shows love, what could be better? If she shows hatred (or almost any other 'reaching out' emotion), he'll consider it love. And if she shows nothing at all, then he'll console himself with the thought that he's now safe from any deceit and disappointment. None of this really seems very comforting. But then, it may be all the comfort the lover has. As Josh suggests, compare 148,2 , for a cut-to-the-chase summary of the situation. For other complex deployments of the possibilities of , see 118,2 and 323x,5 . On as 'to consider', see 90,3 . Compare Mir's treatment of the complexities of : M 817,1 . graphics/laag.jpg