Verse 7x1821arkhe;Nch


G9

In this meter the next-to-last long syllable may be replaced by two shorts.


1
the madness of the mirror is ardent for a single spectacle
2
on our page, draw ruled-lines with the wing of a Pari

tar>> : 'An instrument with which a book is ruled (made of a piece of pasteboard with strings strained and glued across it, which is laid under the paper; the latter being ruled by being slightly pressed over each string); —a ruled line, a line'.
'To draw, drag, pull; to attract, to draw in, suck in, absorb'.

References
Arshi, Imtiyaz Ali Ghazal# 56
Raza, Kalidas Gupta 329
Nuskhah-e-Hamidiyah 95-96
Asi, Abdul Bari 105-106
Gyan Chand 185-186
Hamid Ali Khan Open Image

For background see S. R. Faruqi's choices . This verse is NOT one of his choices; I thought it was interesting because of the Pari imagery, and have added it myself. For more on Ghalib's unpublished verses, see the discussion in 4,8x . As Gyan Chand notes, if a Pari 's shadow falls on you, you will go mad. (By contrast, if the Huma 's shadow falls on you, you'll become a king; on this see 49,3 .) Not only is this an 'A,B' verse, it's also rather an obscure and unsatisfactory one. In the first line, thanks to the flexibility of the , the 'madness of the mirror' can mean: (1) the madness experienced by the mirror; (2) the madness that is identical with the mirror; (3) the madness that is associated with the mirror in some unspecified way; (4) the madness felt by someone else with regard to the mirror. Then of course, when we look toward the rest of the first line we get no help: 'ardent for a single spectacle' gives us no further information about what the 'madness of the mirror' might be. Then the second line launches a completely fresh sequence of imagery about the preparation of a page for writing. It is quite possible to see that preparing the ruled lines on a page (of destiny?) with the 'wing of a Pari' can imply some kind of fated, ineluctable madness. But then-- what is the ' connection ' with the first line? The mere presence of 'madness' in both lines doesn't at all suffice. How does the mirror (of the heart?) resonate with the piece of paper (of destiny?)? The 'objective correlative' relationships remain vague and mushy. graphics/parihair.jpg graphics/ruledlines.jpg