Verse 8x1816aakahe;N jise
G3
1
Oh Lord , even/also in a dream don't show us
2 a
this assembly/Doomsday of thought that they would call 'the world'!
2 b
such an assembly/Doomsday of thought, that they would call it 'the world'!
is the third-person future imperative of ( GRAMMAR )
'A place of assembly or congregation; —(for ), the day of the place of congregation, the day of judgment'.
| References | |
|---|---|
| Arshi, Imtiyaz Ali | Ghazal# 178 |
| Raza, Kalidas Gupta | 261-62 |
| Nuskhah-e-Hamidiyah | 274-275 |
| Asi, Abdul Bari | 270-271 |
| Gyan Chand | 394-395,553 |
| Hamid Ali Khan | Open Image |
The world has been considered nonexistent and has been construed as a single 'assembly of thought'. The prayer is that oh Lord, don't place this 'assembly of thought' before me even in a dream. To call the world an 'assembly of thought' is extremely subtle; and an 'assembly of thought in a dream', even subtler.
== Asi, pp. 270-271
The meaning is clear. In various places Mirza has called the world illusory and dreamlike; here too he has done so. But the first line, with regard to the theme , has not been able to go as far as it should have gone. A mere merger of 'thought and dream' has been created. And damage to the theme has remained-- for if something is a gathering of nothing but thought, how will it be seen? In a dream no doubt, but even in a dream things are seen when their shapes would be, separately, in the mind. If instead of there had been ['weariness, dejection'], then there would have been no reason to omit the verse [from the divan .
== Zamin, p. 398
The world has no reality, it is only an imagined Doomsday []. If even/also in a dream we don't have to keep company with it, then that's good.
== Gyan Chand, p. 395
For background see S. R. Faruqi's choices . For more on Ghalib's unpublished verses, see the discussion in 4,8x .
An urgent plea to the Lord not to show the speaker something 'even in a dream' alerts us chiefly to expect the 'something' to be really horrific, maybe almost unthinkable. What ghastly unbeholdable sight will the second line invite us to contemplate (and thus to mentally 'see')? Of course, under mushairah performance conditions we would be made to wait in suspense for as long as would be conveniently possible.
Then the second line offers us two candidates. One is 'the world' (2a), defined as a kind of Doomsday-gathering of (chaotic? frightening? ominous?) thoughts. The other is a terrible mental event (2b), some kind of Doomsday-gathering of madly swirling thoughts that is so awful that it's the kind of thing people might even call 'the world'. (This idiomatic use of to mean 'such a' is well-established and common; see the 'Grammar' page for examples.)
But the best part is that no matter how we read the second line, it concerns a phantasmagoric spectacle that can only be imagined, can only take place in the mind-- and thus can only be 'seen' in a vision or dream. (The fact that in Urdu one 'sees' a dream [], rather than 'having' a dream, facilitates the imagery here.) If the speaker is asking the Lord not to show him even imaginatively, something that can only be seen imaginatively, he's really asking to be as far from that dreadful vision as possible, and not to 'see' it at all. Whether we take the dreadful vision to be 'the world' itself, or a conglomeration of the speaker's own thoughts (one so terrible it could be equated with 'the world'), the speaker's wild fear tells its own story.
For another , see 119,6 .
graphics/thoughtworld.jpg